Become A Member | Forum | Profiles | Personals | Classifieds | See Who's Online ...
 
View Topic
  Message Boards : Advice : View Topic : 30 Posts, Page 2 of 2
  HomeNewNoticesHot TopicsPollsStatsBlogs Login / Register
 
Embarrassing Experience
 
# 16 : Wednesday 12-4-2017 @ 03:53
 
 
Someone said :

Even it it were. Who are we to judge that it is not worthy of respect?

If his sexuality involves fantasies shared in public, within the limits of decency and without implying illegal activities/relationships. Who are we to judge?

Even if this story is made up, who are we to look down at his desire to share it?

How is it not a valid way for him to express feelings and desires that pertain to his very real experience of his real sexuality the way he perceives it?

Would we rather he does not share, and shrivels in his corner in silence?
Would we rather only people who are mirror images of our own cast, our own sub-group of our special sub-community, ourselves only, us ourselves, sinn féin, us entre-nous, communicate our very own experiences and identical fantasies?

How are made-up stories (if they are) less valid and less real than pictures of ideal men and women falling within the socially acceptable range of wank-fodder ?

How is his story less real than air-brushed pictures of surgically enhanced models?
How would a story that could fit in the long tradition of cheap erotica not belong to a valid conversation, just because you do not feel like this conversation is for youse?

What about respecting his difference, his truth, his story, his view of his world, as long as it does not disturb yours except by your own choice to stir his pixels and bytes your way, a way it was not aimed at or directed towards?


That's a lot of waffle for little substance, Blah....

Like I said, I usually like his stuff but this one was a dud, in my opinion.


Reply
 
 Recent Message Board Topics
Big Brother 2017
Celebrity Big Brother Summer 2017
Looking To Rent A Studio Apartment
What Song Are You Listening To Now?!?!
Game Of Thrones - G.R.R.Martin
Sexy Suspenders
Cross Dresser Shame : Advice Needed
Protest At Oscar Wilde's Statue
 
Hey! If you enjoy shooting the breeze with like-minded people, check out
our Message Boards
• Advice • Coming Out
• Computers • Current Affairs
• Discussion • Food & Drink
• Going Out • Humour
• Health • Music
• Newbies • Sexual Issues
# 17 : Wednesday 12-4-2017 @ 13:46
 
 
Someone said :

That's a lot of waffle for little substance, Blah....

Like I said, I usually like his stuff but this one was a dud, in my opinion.

As stories goes, whether true or false [I am not judging as there is no point in doing so], it would be printable as pulp soft-porn.

The only criteria really here is that he enjoys writing it (as a true account, a fantasized reality, or as a fiction), and that at least one reader enjoys it or interacts with it in a meaningful manner.
Which has happened.

You do no like this one. It does not make it a dud. Only, as you finally pointed out, a dud for you.

"Unmitigated disaster, failed, missed the mark by a mile", all suggested up to know that you were being some well-known critic who had been asked to review his production, and decided that your critic was worth more to humanity than his original post. It suggested that it was the quintessential dud and that your holy duty was to denounce it to the "quality fantasy" police.

The fact that it engaged you so strongly that you felt the need to engage with it, even to undermine it a number of times, means that he produced something that was worth engaging with.

And the part about "wank fodder" was for the benefit of Boggy who seemed to think that this is not a valid reason for writing a piece about his sexual fantasy, real or edited or imagined.
Reply
 
# 18 : Wednesday 12-4-2017 @ 13:48
 
 
'k
Reply
 
# 19 : Wednesday 12-4-2017 @ 13:55
 
 
You ok hun?
Poor Skrothal Sak

Reply
 
# 20 : Wednesday 12-4-2017 @ 15:31
 
 
Wait? Is this an ongoing premature ejaculation problem? Because if it's a one off, I wouldn't really worry about it.
Reply
 
# 21 : Wednesday 12-4-2017 @ 17:31
 
 
Someone said :

As stories goes, whether true or false [I am not judging as there is no point in doing so], it would be printable as pulp soft-porn.

The only criteria really here is that he enjoys writing it (as a true account, a fantasized reality, or as a fiction), and that at least one reader enjoys it or interacts with it in a meaningful manner.
Which has happened.

You do no like this one. It does not make it a dud. Only, as you finally pointed out, a dud for you.

"Unmitigated disaster, failed, missed the mark by a mile", all suggested up to know that you were being some well-known critic who had been asked to review his production, and decided that your critic was worth more to humanity than his original post. It suggested that it was the quintessential dud and that your holy duty was to denounce it to the "quality fantasy" police.

The fact that it engaged you so strongly that you felt the need to engage with it, even to undermine it a number of times, means that he produced something that was worth engaging with.

And the part about "wank fodder" was for the benefit of Boggy who seemed to think that this is not a valid reason for writing a piece about his sexual fantasy, real or edited or imagined.

Ah c'mon now!!

The style and description in the majority of his posts, real, imaginary or whatever are little more than wank fodder. Skrothal Sak then gets all defensive if challenged on something or someone takes the piss out of him. I find it difficult to take him seriously.
Reply
 
# 22 : Wednesday 12-4-2017 @ 18:14
 
 
You've made that point plenty of times, Boggy.

I don't think it's wank fodder at all, it's just a laugh.


But I have to say the joke is more than a bit stale now....
Reply
 
# 23 : Wednesday 12-4-2017 @ 18:30
 
 
Someone said :
You've made that point plenty of times, Boggy.

I don't think it's wank fodder at all, it's just a laugh.


But I have to say the joke is more than a bit stale now....

We'll have to agree to disagree on your first point but I'm in 100% agreement that the joke is getting state now.
Reply
 
# 24 : Wednesday 12-4-2017 @ 19:52
 
 
Someone said :

Nothing more than wank fodder!!

It did its job so (at least for me).

Great thread and let's get real here, he's probably more interesting than 90% of the most active posters on Gaire these days.
Reply
 
# 25 : Wednesday 12-4-2017 @ 19:59
 
 
Someone said :

It did its job so (at least for me).

Great thread and let's get real here, he's probably more interesting than 90% of the most active posters on Gaire these days.

Didn't think straight sex with chunky ladies gets you off!
Reply
 
# 26 : Wednesday 12-4-2017 @ 20:02
 
 
Go on outta that Boggy. Bet you were furiously wanking to that
Reply
 
# 27 : Wednesday 12-4-2017 @ 20:06
 
 
Someone said :
Go on outta that Boggy. Bet you were furiously wanking to that

I'd rather eat a bowl of stinging nettles instead!
Reply
 
# 28 : Wednesday 12-4-2017 @ 20:29
 
 
Nettles are quite nice.
Reply
 
# 29 : Wednesday 12-4-2017 @ 20:39
 
 
Each to their own I suppose
Reply
 
# 30 : Friday 9-6-2017 @ 22:39
 
 
You have an interesting life in fairness. xx
Reply
 
Prev 12Next